<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reliability of Wikipedia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://crestonecreations.com/blog/reliability-of-wikipedia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://crestonecreations.com/blog/reliability-of-wikipedia/</link>
	<description>Something came to mind ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 00:54:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janita</title>
		<link>http://crestonecreations.com/blog/reliability-of-wikipedia/comment-page-1/#comment-272</link>
		<dc:creator>Janita</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 22:44:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crestonecreations.com/blog/?p=306#comment-272</guid>
		<description>No it is not. It can be corrected by anybody. Try university sites or government sites is more reliable and reputable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No it is not. It can be corrected by anybody. Try university sites or government sites is more reliable and reputable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

