Reliability of Wikipedia

Q: Is Wikipedia a good source on the internet for research

A: I think that Wikipedia is a good source on the internet for research. I usually begin with Wikipedia as their layout / content delivery is excellent.
Although it is a publicly edited collective, it has been extant for many years now and poor quality posts are more rare as “bogus” information has been weeded out over time with a world of editors working on the various subjects.

For very new or highly specific topics I would not trust any one source, but for general research I use and trust Wikipedia. (eg. I found that on Wikipedia someone had listed the Princess of Japan as the Valedictorian of her high school class. Since she was my classmate I know it was not her, but rather it was Roo Canfield, I edited the Wikipedia document and brought that up to speed).

So I think that ANY source can have bogus information but that the accuracy of Wikipedia is good enough to count it as a source as reliable as any.
I use and recommend multiple sources, always, and I include Wikipedia as one of those sources.

Here is an article on the subject of Wikipedia Reliability

This entry was posted in Questions and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Reliability of Wikipedia

  1. Janita says:

    No it is not. It can be corrected by anybody. Try university sites or government sites is more reliable and reputable.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>