Q: Is Wikipedia a good source on the internet for research
A: I think that Wikipedia is a good source on the internet for research. I usually begin with Wikipedia as their layout / content delivery is excellent.
Although it is a publicly edited collective, it has been extant for many years now and poor quality posts are more rare as “bogus” information has been weeded out over time with a world of editors working on the various subjects.
For very new or highly specific topics I would not trust any one source, but for general research I use and trust Wikipedia. (eg. I found that on Wikipedia someone had listed the Princess of Japan as the Valedictorian of her high school class. Since she was my classmate I know it was not her, but rather it was Roo Canfield, I edited the Wikipedia document and brought that up to speed).
So I think that ANY source can have bogus information but that the accuracy of Wikipedia is good enough to count it as a source as reliable as any.
I use and recommend multiple sources, always, and I include Wikipedia as one of those sources.
Here is an article on the subject of Wikipedia Reliability

No it is not. It can be corrected by anybody. Try university sites or government sites is more reliable and reputable.